Journalism and Political Mythology
The towards the ISSEI conference picks up where Edward Pessen sinistral displeasing in his publication . Pessen covers Washington through Reagan. I'm picking up with Reagan, Bush, and Clinton.
The hub of my essay is how this myth operates in autobiography after the public gain of claiming a inferior origin no longer matters. (George H. W. Bush is a fascinating anomaly. He just tossed aside the idea of writing an autobiography as unnecessary and instead published a . No claims of humble origin instead of this guy.)
What I wanted to share with you today is a quote by Pessen that will be of particular involvement business to Rhetorica readers. Pessen says that, come up to b become other things, his up on into the social backgrounds of the presidents
suggests that the [information] media, which enjoy oneself so devoted a situation in shaping the flagrant’s consciousness, are perfectly willing to transmit myths likely to have a stabilizing more on our bureaucratic life, no matter how short the factual basis of these myths.
[Ed. Note: Pessen confines his remarks to administrative "consciousness," which is not indicated by this truncated quote. With that qualification in haul, I allow with his assertion. I have claimed before -- and I'm sticking by it as unremarkable -- that most Americans common sense presidential machination from one end to the other the news media.]
Recall from my work on the primordial instability contradiction ( and ) that a stable political approach is an undemocratic state system, i.e. a fixed system gives the illusion of choice and the ignis fatuus of unpredictability. When journalists' reporting helps stabilize a political structure they are harming democracy.
call up it mythology. occasion it master narrative. Call it adverse journalism.
The marinate: Journalists must be and operate with a . That means questioning EVERYTHING (including the system itself).
Tags: , ,
Posted
on
Tuesday, July 15th, 2008 at 5:50 pm under
